Skip to main content
WCS
Menu
Library
Library Catalog
eJournals & eBooks
WCS Research
Archives
Research Use
Finding Aids
Digital Collections
WCS History
WCS Research
Research Publications
Science Data
Services for WCS Researchers
Archives Shop
DTR Illustrations
Browse By Product
About Us
FAQs
Intern or Volunteer
Staff
Donate
Search WCS.org
Search
search
Popular Search Terms
WCS History
Library and Archives
Library and Archives Menu
Library
Archives
WCS Research
Archives Shop
About Us
Donate
Title
Lots of loss with little scrutiny: The attrition of habitat critical for threatened species in Australia
Author(s)
Ward, Michelle S.;Simmonds, Jeremy S.;Reside, April E.;Watson, James E. M.;Rhodes, Jonathan R.;Possingham, Hugh P.;Trezise, James;Fletcher, Rachel;File, Lindsey;Taylor, Martin
Published
2019
Publisher
Conservation Science and Practice
Published Version DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/csp2.117
Abstract
Australia has one of the worst extinction rates of any nation, yet there has been little assessment of the effect of its flagship environmental legislation, the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (EPBC Act), to prevent species extinction. By coupling remotely sensed forest and woodland data with the distributions of 1,638 terrestrial threatened species, terrestrial migratory species, and threatened ecological communities, we quantified the loss of potential habitat and communities since the EPBC Act came into force in 2000. We found that over 7.7 million ha of potential habitat and communities were cleared in the period 2000–2017. Of this clearing, over 93% was not referred to the Federal Government for assessment, meaning the loss was not scrutinized under the EPBC Act. While 1,390 (84%) species suffered loss, Mount Cooper striped skink, Keighery's macarthuria, and Southern black‐throated finch lost 25, 23, and 10% of potential habitat, respectively. Iconic Australian species, such as koala, also lost ~1 million ha (2.3%) of potential habitat. Our analysis showed that the EPBC Act is ineffective at protecting potential habitat for terrestrial threatened species, terrestrial migratory species, or threatened ecological communities. We recommend that when scientifically determinable, critical habitat is demarcated for listed species and communities, which provides absolute protection that is enforced, monitored, and investigated by the regulator. Without a fundamental change in how environmental law is enforced, Australia faces an increasing extinction rate.
Keywords
Australia;biodiversity conservation;Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999;environmental policy;environmental regulation;habitat destruction;habitat loss;migratory species;threatened ecological communities;threatened species
Access Full Text
A full-text copy of this article may be available. Please email the
WCS Library
to request.
Back
PUB24883