Title
Misreading the Conservation Landscape
Author(s)
Kent H. Redford
Published
2011
Publisher
Oryx
Abstract
The social sciences are often seen as being in opposition to conservation and the practice of conservationists. Yet social scientists have made important contributions to conservation and could make even more contributions if they are willing to use their perceptive, insightful tools as a means of both improving the practice of conservation and sharpening social science’s critique of conservation ideas and practices. I provide two lists: first, a list of the ways in which I think social science work has already improved conservation practice and, second, a set of generalizations made by some social scientists about the practice of conservation that are incorrect or incomplete. I argue that a more careful application of social science tools and approaches could begin an active and informed exploration of the diversity of values, histories, institutions, politics and approaches in conservation. This would facilitate the sharpening of social science’s critique of conservation ideas and practices and, through these, improve the practice of conservation.
Keywords
collaborations, conservation, social sciences
Full Citation
Redford, K.H. 2011. Misreading the Conservation Landscape. Oryx 45(3): 324-330.

Access Full Text


Back

DMX1527300000