Skip to main content
WCS
Menu
Library
Library Catalog
eJournals & eBooks
WCS Research
Archives
Research Use
Finding Aids
Digital Collections
WCS History
WCS Research
Research Publications
Science Data
Services for WCS Researchers
Archives Shop
Bronx Zoo
Department of Tropical Research
Browse By Product
About Us
FAQs
Intern or Volunteer
Staff
Donate
Search WCS.org
Search
search
Popular Search Terms
WCS History
Library and Archives
Library and Archives Menu
Library
Archives
WCS Research
Archives Shop
About Us
Donate
en
fr
Title
WCS Canada Comments Follow-up - Howard's Pass Terms of Reference - January 2016
Author(s)
John Weaver and Justina Ray
Published
2016
Publisher
[Correspondence]
Abstract
Following a request for detail from the Mackenzie Valley Environmental Impact Review Board, we provide further clarity to our previous comments. In particular, we suggest the mine and the means of transporting materials and products must be considered in a single environmental assessment process, especially since the road is being upgraded to a gravel haul road solely to service the mine. Independent Environmental Assessment (EA) may allow several small decisions which will fail to address any larger cumulative effects. Further, the EA must evaluate an alternative where neither the mine nor the accompanying material and product transport system would be permitted, rather than one that simply evaluates the no-project scenario as the absence of a road but still presumes the operation of a mine.
Full Citation
[Correspondence] Weaver, John and Ray, Justina (2016). Clarifications to Re: EA1516 -01, Selwyn Chihong, Howard's Pass Access Road Upgrade Project: The Developer's Proposed Terms of Reference
Access Full Text
Back
DMX3273100000