Skip to main content
WCS
Menu
Library
Library Catalog
eJournals & eBooks
WCS Research
Archives
Research Use
Finding Aids
Digital Collections
WCS History
WCS Research
Research Publications
Science Data
Services for WCS Researchers
Archives Shop
Bronx Zoo
Department of Tropical Research
Browse By Product
About Us
FAQs
Intern or Volunteer
Staff
Donate
Search WCS.org
Search
search
Popular Search Terms
WCS History
Library and Archives
Library and Archives Menu
Library
Archives
WCS Research
Archives Shop
About Us
Donate
en
fr
Title
Management preferences, perceived benefits and conflicts among resource users and managers in the Mafia Island Marine Park, Tanzania
Author(s)
McClanahan, T.R.; Cinner, J.; Kamukuru, A.T.; Abunge, C.; Ndagala, J.
Published
2008
Publisher
Environmental Conservation
Published Version DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/S0376892908005250
Abstract
Conflicts between resource users and managers are common and well documented on Mafia Island (Tanzania), where there has been a history of unresolved conflict over marine conservation initiatives. The perceptions of fisheries and park restrictions among resource users and managers were evaluated to try to understand the underlying causes of these conflicts. Responses concerning management preferences of government officials employed by the Mafia Island Marine Park (MIMP), personnel of the fisheries department, and heads of households in three villages in and out of the Park were compared. The largest differences in perceptions were found between villagers and managers, but all respondents agreed that minimum fish lengths and gear restrictions were beneficial and that benefits increased along the scale of the individual - community - national government. Villagers and government officials differed most in their perceptions towards area-based management, spatial and temporal closures, and species restrictions. Perceptions of management restrictions and benefits were only weakly correlated with the socioeconomic status of the villagers, but more strongly correlated with their living in or out of the Park and their family's economic options. The most negative perceptions towards restrictions were found in villages near fisheries closures, where there was a heavy reliance on marine resources and a higher numbers of jobs per household, but less reliance on cash crops, animal husbandry and tourism. The lack of these three options appears to have produced lower levels of support for MIMP and associated restrictions, and might be overcome by (1) using gear and minimum size restrictions more than fisheries closures and (2) increasing access to tourism, cash crops, animal husbandry and salaried employment, rather than simply increasing livelihood diversity. © 2009 Foundation for Environmental Conservation.
Keywords
Attitudes; Co-management; Coral reefs; Fisheries management; Indian Ocean; Marine protected area; NIMBY (not in my back yard); Park management; Crops; Environmental protection; Fisheries; Managers; Marine biology; Ocean engineering; Oceanography; Parks; Reefs; Management; coral reef; fishery management; habitat conservation; island; marine park; preference behavior; protected area; resource management; village; Africa; East Africa; Indian Ocean; Mafia Island; Pwani; Sub-Saharan Africa; Tanzania; Animalia; Anthozoa
Access Full Text
A full-text copy of this article may be available. Please email the
WCS Library
to request.
Back
PUB10434