Skip to main content
WCS
Menu
Library
Library Catalog
eJournals & eBooks
WCS Research
Archives
Research Use
Finding Aids
Digital Collections
WCS History
WCS Research
Research Publications
Science Data
Services for WCS Researchers
Archives Shop
Bronx Zoo
Department of Tropical Research
Browse By Product
About Us
FAQs
Intern or Volunteer
Staff
Donate
Search WCS.org
Search
search
Popular Search Terms
WCS History
Library and Archives
Library and Archives Menu
Library
Archives
WCS Research
Archives Shop
About Us
Donate
en
fr
Title
Within-species differences in primate social structure: Evolution of plasticity and phylogenetic constraints
Author(s)
Chapman, C.A.; Rothman, J.M.
Published
2009
Publisher
Primates
Published Version DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10329-008-0123-0
Abstract
Primate socioecological studies have attempted to derive general frameworks using the average behavioural traits of species or genera to place them into categories. However, with the accumulation of primate studies, it is timely to place more emphasis on understanding within-species variation in social structure. In this review we have four objectives. First, we examine within-species variation in the potential determinants of social structure, including diet, demography, predation and infanticide, and document considerable variation. Second, we present case studies of within-species variation in social structure to illustrate the potential magnitude of this variation. For example, there are cases within a single interbreeding population where multi-male, uni-male, fission-fusion and monogamous groups are found. Third, by examining widespread primate lineages that occur in a variety of habitats, we note that there are differences in the magnitude of variation in social structures across different lineages and as a result we consider phylogenetic constraints on phenotypic variation in social structure. Finally, we reflect on the implications of extensive variation in social structure. We suggest that primate social structure will represent a combination of adaptation to present-day environment and phylogenetic inertia. To advance our understanding of the relative contribution of phylogeny versus ecology we propose two approaches. One approach is to compare groups in the same interbreeding population that inhabit different ecological conditions. Any differences that are found can be attributed to ecological differences, since phylogeny should not play a role within a single population. The second approach is to study distantly related species that have similar social structures to illustrate how similar ecological pressures might be operating to select for parallel social structures. © Japan Monkey Centre and Springer 2009.
Keywords
adaptation; feeding behavior; phylogeny; primate; reproductive strategy; social structure; adaptation; animal; diet; evolution; feeding behavior; phylogeny; physiology; predation; primate; review; social dominance; social environment; species difference; Adaptation, Biological; Animals; Hierarchy, Social; Predatory Behavior; Primates; Species Specificity; Feeding competition; Mating systems; Phenotypic plasticity; Social structure; Socioecology
Access Full Text
A full-text copy of this article may be available. Please email the
WCS Library
to request.
Back
PUB10462