Skip to main content
WCS
Menu
Library
Library Catalog
eJournals & eBooks
WCS Research
Archives
Research Use
Finding Aids
Digital Collections
WCS History
WCS Research
Research Publications
Science Data
Services for WCS Researchers
Archives Shop
Bronx Zoo
Department of Tropical Research
Browse By Product
About Us
FAQs
Intern or Volunteer
Staff
Donate
Search WCS.org
Search
search
Popular Search Terms
WCS History
Library and Archives
Library and Archives Menu
Library
Archives
WCS Research
Archives Shop
About Us
Donate
en
fr
Title
Assessing the effectiveness of protected areas: Paradoxes call for pluralism in evaluating conservation performance
Author(s)
Caro T., Gardner T.A., Stoner C., Fitzherbert E., Davenport T.R.B.
Published
2009
Publisher
Diversity and Distributions
Published Version DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1472-4642.2008.00522.x
Abstract
Aim: To highlight and examine apparent paradoxes in assessing the effectiveness of different forms of land-use for biodiversity conservation. Location: Tanzania. Methods: We compare and contrast the findings of two recent and seemingly conflicting studies on the effectiveness of conservation protection strategies in Tanzania. We evaluate these studies in the context of a wider body of evidence relating to the problem of determining protected area performance. Results: We highlight the importance of landscape-scale management approaches for biodiversity conservation; establishing clear management and monitoring objectives in advance; the interrelation between the choice of target species and the appropriate spatial scale over which to measure their fate; and differences between snapshot and longitudinal scales in assessing the effectiveness of conservation strategies. Main conclusions: Protected area assessments should not promote an isolated focus on particular conservation targets or methods of monitoring and evaluating the effectiveness of conservation strategies. Instead we argue for a more pluralistic approach to evaluating conservation performance that can help to reveal where potential synergies in tackling different objectives exist, and clarifying the trade-offs when they do not. © 2008 The Authors.
Keywords
biodiversity; comparative study; conservation management; land use planning; protected area; trade-off; Africa; East Africa; Sub-Saharan Africa; Tanzania
Access Full Text
A full-text copy of this article may be available. Please email the
WCS Library
to request.
Back
PUB10483