Skip to main content
WCS
Menu
Library
Library Catalog
eJournals & eBooks
WCS Research
Archives
Research Use
Finding Aids
Digital Collections
WCS History
WCS Research
Research Publications
Science Data
Services for WCS Researchers
Archives Shop
Bronx Zoo
Department of Tropical Research
Browse By Product
About Us
FAQs
Intern or Volunteer
Staff
Donate
Search WCS.org
Search
search
Popular Search Terms
WCS History
Library and Archives
Library and Archives Menu
Library
Archives
WCS Research
Archives Shop
About Us
Donate
en
fr
Title
Estimating population density from indirect sign: Track counts and the Formozov-Malyshev-Pereleshin formula
Author(s)
Stephens P.A., Zaumyslova O.Yu., Miquelle D.G., Myslenkov A.I., Hayward G.D.
Published
2006
Publisher
Animal Conservation
Published Version DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-1795.2006.00044.x
Abstract
For many purposes it is often desirable to estimate animal population densities over large areas. Where total counts are not possible and sightings are relatively rare, a range of methods exists to estimate densities from indirect sign. Such methods are frequently unreliable and usually require independent calibration or confirmation. We present an analytical method for estimating population density from track counts. The method, widely known in the Russian Federation but not in the English language scientific literature, requires counts of tracks of known age, together with estimates of animal daily travel distances. We use simulations to verify the theoretical basis of the approach and to indicate potential precision that may be achieved. We illustrate application of the approach using a large data set on ungulate track counts in the Russian Far East. We suggest that under most circumstances, nonparametric bootstrapping will be the most appropriate method for deriving estimates of confidence intervals about density estimates. As with other approaches to estimating density from indirect sign, the method that we discuss is vulnerable to violations of an array of underlying assumptions. However, it is easily applied and could represent an important method by which the relationship between indices of abundance and absolute density can be understood. © 2006 The Zoological Society of London.
Keywords
abundance estimation; analytical method; bootstrapping; population density; population estimation; precision; theoretical study; tracking; ungulate; Eurasia; Russian Federation; Animalia; Ungulata
Access Full Text
A full-text copy of this article may be available. Please email the
WCS Library
to request.
Back
PUB10844