Skip to main content
WCS
Menu
Library
Library Catalog
eJournals & eBooks
WCS Research
Archives
Research Use
Finding Aids
Digital Collections
WCS History
WCS Research
Research Publications
Science Data
Services for WCS Researchers
Archives Shop
Bronx Zoo
Department of Tropical Research
Browse By Product
About Us
FAQs
Intern or Volunteer
Staff
Donate
Search WCS.org
Search
search
Popular Search Terms
WCS History
Library and Archives
Library and Archives Menu
Library
Archives
WCS Research
Archives Shop
About Us
Donate
en
fr
Title
Quantifying forest above ground carbon content using LiDAR remote sensing
Author(s)
Patenaude, G; Hill, RA; Milne, R; Gaveau, DLA; Briggs, BBJ; Dawson, TP
Published
2004
Publisher
REMOTE SENSING OF ENVIRONMENT
Published Version DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2004.07.016
Abstract
The UNFCCC and interest in the source of the missing terrestrial carbon sink are prompting research and development into methods for carbon accounting in forest ecosystems. Here we present a canopy height quantile-based approach for quantifying above ground carbon content (AGCC) in a temperate deciduous woodland, by means of a discrete-return, small-footprint airborne LiDAR. Fieldwork was conducted in Monks Wood National Nature Reserve UK to estimate the AGCC of five stands from forest mensuration and allometric relations. In parallel, a digital canopy height model (DCHM) and a digital terrain model (DTM) were derived from elevation measurements obtained by means of an Optech Airborne Laser Terrain Mapper 1210. A quantile-based approach was adopted to select a representative statistic of height distributions per plot. A forestry yield model was selected as a basis to estimate stemwood volume per plot from these heights metrics. Agreement of r=0.74 at the plot level was achieved between ground-based AGCC estimates and those derived from the DCHM. Using a 20x20 in grids superposed to the DCHM, the AGCC was estimated at the stand level and at the woodland level. At the stand level, the agreement between the plot data upscaled in proportion to area and the LiDAR estimates was r=0.85. At the woodland level, LiDAR estimates were nearly 24% lower than those from the upscaled plot data. This suggests that field-based approaches alone may not be adequate for carbon accounting in heterogeneous forests. Conversely, the LiDAR 20x20 in grid approach has an enhanced capability of monitoring the natural variability of AGCC across the woodland. (C) 2004 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Keywords
LASER SCANNER DATA; STAND CHARACTERISTICS; TREE HEIGHT; THEMATIC MAPPER; AIRBORNE LIDAR; STEM VOLUME; INVENTORY; BIOMASS; ECOSYSTEM; LANDSAT
Access Full Text
A full-text copy of this article may be available. Please email the
WCS Library
to request.
Back
PUB11101