Skip to main content
WCS
Menu
Library
Library Catalog
eJournals & eBooks
WCS Research
Archives
Research Use
Finding Aids
Digital Collections
WCS History
WCS Research
Research Publications
Science Data
Services for WCS Researchers
Archives Shop
Bronx Zoo
Department of Tropical Research
Browse By Product
About Us
FAQs
Intern or Volunteer
Staff
Donate
Search WCS.org
Search
search
Popular Search Terms
WCS History
Library and Archives
Library and Archives Menu
Library
Archives
WCS Research
Archives Shop
About Us
Donate
en
fr
Title
Biofuel plantations on forested lands: Double jeopardy for biodiversity and climate [Plantaciones de biocombustible en terrenos boscosos: Doble peligro para la biodiversidad y el clima].
Author(s)
Danielsen F., Beukema H., Burgess N.D., Parish F., BrUhl C.A., Donald P.F., Murdiyarso D., Phalan B., Reijnders L., Struebig M., Fitzherbert E.B.
Published
2009
Publisher
Conservation Biology
Published Version DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2008.01096.x
Abstract
The growing demand for biofuels is promoting the expansion of a number of agricultural commodities, including oil palm (Elaeis guineensis). Oil-palm plantations cover over 13 million ha, primarily in Southeast Asia, where they have directly or indirectly replaced tropical rainforest. We explored the impact of the spread of oil-palm plantations on greenhouse gas emission and biodiversity. We assessed changes in carbon stocks with changing land use and compared this with the amount of fossil-fuel carbon emission avoided through its replacement by biofuel carbon. We estimated it would take between 75 and 93 years for the carbon emissions saved through use of biofuel to compensate for the carbon lost through forest conversion, depending on how the forest was cleared. If the original habitat was peatland, carbon balance would take more than 600 years. Conversely, planting oil palms on degraded grassland would lead to a net removal of carbon within 10 years. These estimates have associated uncertainty, but their magnitude and relative proportions seem credible. We carried out a meta-analysis of published faunal studies that compared forest with oil palm. We found that plantations supported species-poor communities containing few forest species. Because no published data on flora were available, we present results from our sampling of plants in oil palm and forest plots in Indonesia. Although the species richness of pteridophytes was higher in plantations, they held few forest species. Trees, lianas, epiphytic orchids, and indigenous palms were wholly absent from oil-palm plantations. The majority of individual plants and animals in oil-palm plantations belonged to a small number of generalist species of low conservation concern. As countries strive to meet obligations to reduce carbon emissions under one international agreement (Kyoto Protocol), they may not only fail to meet their obligations under another (Convention on Biological Diversity) but may actually hasten global climate change. Reducing deforestation is likely to represent a more effective climate-change mitigation strategy than converting forest for biofuel production, and it may help nations meet their international commitments to reduce biodiversity loss. © 2008 Society for Conservation Biology.
Keywords
vegetable oil; biodiversity; biofuel; carbon balance; climate effect; deforestation; emission control; forest clearance; greenhouse gas; Kyoto Protocol; land use change; nature conservation; peatland; plantation; rainforest; tropical forest; agriculture; animal; Arecaceae; article; biodiversity; bioenergy; chemistry; greenhouse effect; invertebrate; physiology; tree; vertebrate; Agriculture; Animals; Arecaceae; Biodiversity; Bioelectric Energy Sources; Greenhouse Effect; Invertebrates; Plant Oils; Trees; Vertebrates; Asia; Eurasia; Indonesia; Southeast Asia; Animalia; Elaeis; Elaeis guineensis; Orchidaceae; Pteridophyta
Access Full Text
A full-text copy of this article may be available. Please email the
WCS Library
to request.
Back
PUB11916