Skip to main content
WCS
Menu
Library
Library Catalog
eJournals & eBooks
WCS Research
Archives
Research Use
Finding Aids
Digital Collections
WCS History
WCS Research
Research Publications
Science Data
Services for WCS Researchers
Archives Shop
Bronx Zoo
Department of Tropical Research
Browse By Product
About Us
FAQs
Intern or Volunteer
Staff
Donate
Search WCS.org
Search
search
Popular Search Terms
WCS History
Library and Archives
Library and Archives Menu
Library
Archives
WCS Research
Archives Shop
About Us
Donate
en
fr
Title
Diet of Imperial Cormorants (Phalacrocorax atriceps) and Rock Shags (P. Magellanicus) breeding sympatrically in Patagonia, Argentina
Author(s)
Bulgarella M., Pizarra L.C., Quintana F., Sapoznikow A., Gosztonyi A., Kuba L.
Published
2008
Publisher
Ornitología Neotropical
Abstract
We analyzed the diet of Imperial Cormorants (Phalacrocorax atriceps) and Rock Shags (P. magellanicus) breeding sympatrically at Malaspina Inlet, Patagonia, Argentina, in order to assess food partitioning between them. Sixty-four regurgitations were collected during the 1999 breeding season on two colonies separated by 2.2 km. Both species shared many of the identified prey items, mainly fish arid crustacean. However, Imperial Cormorants fed on a wider variety of preys than Rock Shags did. Moreover, the latter preyed mainly on benthic fish whereas Imperial Cormorants also consumed pelagic fishes, thus foraging in most of the water column. Among fish, Notothenia sp., followed by Helcogrammoides cunninghami, predominated in the diet of both cormorants, whereas Imperial Cormorants also preyed on Engraulis anchoita and Merluccius hubssi. The spatial distribution of diet samples showed a clear overlap in the food resources used by both cormorants as well as a convergence in the fish composition of the diet. The observed overlap in the diet was in concordance with the relative overlap in the foraging areas used by both species, as reported in previous studies, thus probably reflecting good food availability in waters surrounding, Malaspina Inlet. Therefore, the mechanisms of a possible ecological segregation that resulted in the documented differences in the diet of both species could have arisen from a combination of dissimilarities in diving strategies and foraging behavior. © The Neotropical Ornithological Society.
Access Full Text
A full-text copy of this article may be available. Please email the
WCS Library
to request.
Back
PUB11958