Skip to main content
WCS
Menu
Library
Library Catalog
eJournals & eBooks
WCS Research
Archives
Research Use
Finding Aids
Digital Collections
WCS History
WCS Research
Research Publications
Science Data
Services for WCS Researchers
Archives Shop
Bronx Zoo
Department of Tropical Research
Browse By Product
About Us
FAQs
Intern or Volunteer
Staff
Donate
Search WCS.org
Search
search
Popular Search Terms
WCS History
Library and Archives
Library and Archives Menu
Library
Archives
WCS Research
Archives Shop
About Us
Donate
en
fr
Title
Improving the use of science in conservation: Lessons from the Florida panther
Author(s)
Conroy, M.J.; Beier, P.; Quigley, H.; Vaughan, M.R.
Published
2006
Publisher
Journal of Wildlife Management
Published Version DOI
https://doi.org/10.2193/0022-541X(2006)70[1:ITUOSI]2.0.CO;2
Abstract
In a companion article (Beier et al. 2006), we identified 2 sets of unreliable inferences that may compromise efforts to conserve the Florida panther (Puma concolor coryi). In spite of serious flaws in methodology and interpretation, these unreliable conclusions have appeared in prominent, peer-refereed scientific journals and have been repeatedly cited and miscited in support of panther conservation. Future editors and referees may reduce these errors by insisting on adherence to an Introduction, Methods, Results, and Discussion (IMRAD) format; checking improbable assertions attributed to earlier papers; and refusing to allow scientific inference in publication formats not subject to scientific peer review (e.g., editorials). We urge conservation biologists to view science as an adaptive process and to use the method of multiple working hypotheses (Chamberlin 1890) that are now a central feature of adaptive resource management (Walters 1986, Williams et al. 2002). We advocate a workshop approach, similar to that used for analysis of data for the northern spotted owl (Strix occidentalis; Anderson et al. 1999), to deal with scientific disagreement where, as in the case with panthers, stakeholders have entrenched points of view. Finally, we recommend the creation of an independent Scientific Steering Committee to address long-term issues of future research and monitoring of Florida panthers.
Keywords
mammal; monitoring; nature conservation; research work; resource management; Florida [United States]; North America; United States; Puma concolor; Puma concolor coryi; Strigiformes; Strix occidentalis; Strix occidentalis caurina; MULTIPLE WORKING HYPOTHESES; GENETIC INTROGRESSION; RELIABLE KNOWLEDGE; MANAGEMENT; ECOLOGY
Access Full Text
A full-text copy of this article may be available. Please email the
WCS Library
to request.
Back
PUB12235