Skip to main content
WCS
Menu
Library
Library Catalog
eJournals & eBooks
WCS Research
Archives
Research Use
Finding Aids
Digital Collections
WCS History
WCS Research
Research Publications
Science Data
Services for WCS Researchers
Archives Shop
Bronx Zoo
Department of Tropical Research
Browse By Product
About Us
FAQs
Intern or Volunteer
Staff
Donate
Search WCS.org
Search
search
Popular Search Terms
WCS History
Library and Archives
Library and Archives Menu
Library
Archives
WCS Research
Archives Shop
About Us
Donate
en
fr
Title
Paying for Tolerance: Rural Citizens' Attitudes toward Wolf Depredation and Compensation
Author(s)
Naughton-Treves, L.; Grossberg, R.; Treves, A.
Published
2003
Publisher
Conservation Biology
Published Version DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2003.00060.x
Abstract
As wolf (Canis lupus) populations recover in Wisconsin (U.S.A.), their depredations on livestock, pets, and hunting dogs have increased. We used a mail-back survey to assess the tolerance of 535 rural citizens of wolves and their preferences regarding the management of "problem" wolves. Specifically, we tested whether people who had lost domestic animals to wolves or other predators were less tolerant of wolves than neighboring residents who had not and whether compensation payments improved tolerance of wolves. We assessed tolerance via proxy measures related to an individual's preferred wolf population size for Wisconsin and the likelihood she or he would shoot a wolf. We also measured individuals' approval of lethal control and other wolf-management tactics under five conflict scenarios. Multivariate analysis, revealed that the strongest predictor of tolerance was social group. Bear (Ursus americanus) hunters were concerned about losing valuable hounds to wolves and were more likely to approve of lethal control and reducing the wolf population than were livestock producers, who were more concerned than general residents. To a lesser degree, education level, experience of loss, and gender were also significant. Livestock producers and bear hunters who had been compensated for their losses to wolves were not more tolerant than their counterparts who alleged a loss but received no compensation. Yet all respondents approved of compensation payments as a management strategy. Our results indicate that deep-rooted social identity and occupation are more powerful predictors of tolerance of wolves than individual encounters with these large carnivores.
Keywords
canid; domestic species; nature-society relations; predation; wildlife management; North America; United States; Wisconsin; Animalia; Canidae; Canis; Canis familiaris; Canis lupus; Ursus; Ursus americanus; REINTRODUCTION; MANAGEMENT; CONFLICT; ANIMALS; FOREST; PEOPLE; WOLVES; COSTS
Access Full Text
A full-text copy of this article may be available. Please email the
WCS Library
to request.
Back
PUB12465