Skip to main content
WCS
Menu
Library
Library Catalog
eJournals & eBooks
WCS Research
Archives
Research Use
Finding Aids
Digital Collections
WCS History
WCS Research
Research Publications
Science Data
Services for WCS Researchers
Archives Shop
Bronx Zoo
Department of Tropical Research
Browse By Product
About Us
FAQs
Intern or Volunteer
Staff
Donate
Search WCS.org
Search
search
Popular Search Terms
WCS History
Library and Archives
Library and Archives Menu
Library
Archives
WCS Research
Archives Shop
About Us
Donate
en
fr
Title
Do levels of income explain differences in game abundance? An empirical test in two Honduran villages
Author(s)
Demmer J., Godoy R., Wilkie D., Overman H., Taimur M., Fernando K., Gupta R., McSweeney K., Brokaw N., Sriram S., Price T.
Published
2002
Publisher
Biodiversity and Conservation
Published Version DOI
https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020305903156
Abstract
Although researchers have documented the role of anthropogenic hunting pressure on the abundance of game, few have measured the direct effects of income or economic development on game abundance. Economic theory tends to predict an ambiguous causal relation between income and the abundance of game. Here we test whether income (a standard proxy of economic development) erodes the abundance of game in two Tawahka Amerindian villages in the rain forest of Honduras. The two villages have similar ecologies and weather and lie 17 km apart but differ in income, population size, wealth, the presence of outside institutions, and hunting pressure. A census of animals done over 2 continuous years suggests that the richer village had less game and relatively fewer large-bodied animals. At the level of animal groups (e.g., mammals) or individual species, or when we include controls for the simultaneous effect of vegetation type, distance from the start of the hunting trail, and time of the year through a random-effect probit model, the two villages display no statistically significant differences in game abundance. A random-effect, multivariate tobit model, in fact, suggests that being in the more remote village correlated with 43.5% fewer animals seen in any one encounter; results were significant at the 99% confidence level. The conclusions contain a discussion of why income might produce ambiguous effects on game abundance and the tradeoffs of using bivariate and multivariate techniques to analyze the covariates of game abundance in the tropical rain forests of the New World.
Keywords
abundance; fauna; household income; hunting; nature-society relations; Honduras; Animalia; Mammalia
Access Full Text
A full-text copy of this article may be available. Please email the
WCS Library
to request.
Back
PUB12558