Title
The effects of marine parks and fishing on coral reefs of northern Tanzania
Author(s)
McClanahan, T.R.; Muthiga, N.A.; Kamukuru, A.T.; Machano, H.; Kiambo, R.W.
Published
1999
Publisher
Biological Conservation
Abstract
The macrobenthic (coral, algae, and sea urchins) and fish communities in 15 back-reef sites on the patch and rock-island reefs of southern Kenya and northern Tanzania (~250 km of coastline) were studied in order to (1) test an overfishing model developed in Kenya's fringing reef (McClanahan, 1995a, A coral reef ecosystem-fisheries model: impacts of fishing intensity and catch selection on reef structure and processes. Ecol. Model. 80, 1-19.), (2) develop a baseline of information on Tanzanian coral reef ecosystems, and (3) determine if some of the government gazetted but unprotected marine reserves were still deserving of protective management. The overfishing model was tested by comparing five sites in two fully protected reefs - one in southern Kenya (Kisite Marine National Park) and the other in Zanzibar (Chumbe Island Coral Park) - with 10 sites in eight fished reefs, and by comparing coral surveys conducted in reefs off of Dar es Salaam in 1974 with present-day studies. These comparisons suggest that fishing is primarily reducing the abundance of angelfish, butterflyfish, parrotfish, scavengers, surgeonfish, and triggerfish groups while some species of small-bodied damselfish and wrasse appear to have benefited. The total fish wet weight estimate was 3.5 times higher in protected than unprotected sites. Sea urchin abundance was six times higher, and predation rates on tethered sea urchin Echinometra mathaei were two times lower, in unprotected compared to protected sites. This is largely attributable to the reduction of the red-lined triggerfish Balistapus undulatus and other sea urchin predators by fishing. Loss of coral cover and changes in coral generic composition had occurred in four of the five sites visited in the Dar es Salaam area after the 22-year period. There was no evidence for species losses. One site appeared to be severely damaged over this time. Some reefs were dominated by fleshy brown algae, such as Sargassum and Dictyota, which may result from a loss of grazers and coral cover. Reduced fishing effort, elimination of destructive gear (dynamite and beach seines), protection of vulnerable species and, in some cases, sea urchin reductions could rectify the problems of overfishing. Despite the damage, the gazetted but unprotected reefs of Mbudya and Bongoyo still have high potential as marine protected areas due to the persistence of species and reef structure.
Keywords
coral reef; fish; marine park; overfishing; Tanzania; Balistapus undulatus; Echinometra mathaei; SEA-URCHIN; KENYAN; COMMUNITIES; BIOMASS; DIVERSITY; LAGOONS; FISHES; POPULATIONS; COMPLEXITY

Access Full Text

A full-text copy of this article may be available. Please email the WCS Library to request.



Back

PUB12800