Skip to main content
WCS
Menu
Library
Library Catalog
eJournals & eBooks
WCS Research
Archives
Research Use
Finding Aids
Digital Collections
WCS History
WCS Research
Research Publications
Science Data
Services for WCS Researchers
Archives Shop
Bronx Zoo
Department of Tropical Research
Browse By Product
About Us
FAQs
Intern or Volunteer
Staff
Donate
Search WCS.org
Search
search
Popular Search Terms
WCS History
Library and Archives
Library and Archives Menu
Library
Archives
WCS Research
Archives Shop
About Us
Donate
en
fr
Title
Line transect sampling of primates: Can animal-to-observer distance methods work?
Author(s)
Buckland, S. T.;Plumptre, A. J.;Thomas, L.;Rexstad, E. A.
Published
2010
Publisher
International Journal of Primatology
Abstract
Line transect sampling is widely used for estimating abundance of primate populations. Researchers commonly use animal-to-observer distances (AODs) in analysis, in preference to perpendicular distances from the line, which is in marked contrast with standard practice for other applications of line transect sampling. We formalize the mathematical shortcomings of approaches based on AODs, and show that they are likely to give strongly biased estimates of density. We review papers that claim good performance for the method, and explore this performance through simulations. These confirm strong bias in estimates of density using AODs. We conclude that AOD methods are conceptually flawed, and that they cannot in general provide valid estimates of density. © Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010.
Keywords
Animal-to-observer distances;Distance sampling;Estimating primate density;Kelker strip;Modified Kelker method;Primate surveys
Access Full Text
A full-text copy of this article may be available. Please email the
WCS Library
to request.
Back
PUB13474