Skip to main content
WCS
Menu
Library
Library Catalog
eJournals & eBooks
WCS Research
Archives
Research Use
Finding Aids
Digital Collections
WCS History
WCS Research
Research Publications
Science Data
Services for WCS Researchers
Archives Shop
Bronx Zoo
Department of Tropical Research
Browse By Product
About Us
FAQs
Intern or Volunteer
Staff
Donate
Search WCS.org
Search
search
Popular Search Terms
WCS History
Library and Archives
Library and Archives Menu
Library
Archives
WCS Research
Archives Shop
About Us
Donate
en
fr
Title
Hard choices: Making trade-offs between biodiversity conservation and human well-being
Author(s)
McShane, T. O.;Hirsch, P. D.;Trung, T. C.;Songorwa, A. N.;Kinzig, A.;Monteferri, B.;Mutekanga, D.;Thang, H. V.;Dammert, J. L.;Pulgar-Vidal, M.;Welch-Devine, M.;Peter Brosius, J.;Coppolillo, P.;O'Connor, S.
Published
2011
Publisher
Biological Conservation
Published Version DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2010.04.038
Abstract
Win-win solutions that both conserve biodiversity and promote human well-being are difficult to realize. Trade-offs and the hard choices they entail are the norm. Since 2008, the Advancing Conservation in a Social Context (ACSC) research initiative has been investigating the complex trade-offs that exist between human well-being and biodiversity conservation goals, and between conservation and other economic, political and social agendas across multiple scales. Resolving trade-offs is difficult because social problems - of which conservation is one - can be perceived and understood in a variety of disparate ways, influenced (in part at least) by how people are raised and educated, their life experiences, and the options they have faced. Pre-existing assumptions about the "right" approach to conservation often obscure important differences in both power and understanding, and can limit the success of policy and programmatic interventions. The new conservation debate challenges conservationists to be explicit about losses, costs, and hard choices so they can be openly discussed and honestly negotiated. Not to do so can lead to unrealized expectations, and ultimately to unresolved conflict. This paper explores the background and limitations of win-win approaches to conservation and human well-being, discusses the prospect of approaching conservation challenges in terms of trade-offs and hard choices, and presents a set of guiding principles that can serve to orient strategic analysis and communication regarding trade-offs. © 2010 Elsevier Ltd.
Keywords
Biodiversity conservation;Development;Human well-being;Trade-offs
Access Full Text
A full-text copy of this article may be available. Please email the
WCS Library
to request.
Back
PUB14320