Skip to main content
WCS
Menu
Library
Library Catalog
eJournals & eBooks
WCS Research
Archives
Research Use
Finding Aids
Digital Collections
WCS History
WCS Research
Research Publications
Science Data
Services for WCS Researchers
Archives Shop
Bronx Zoo
Department of Tropical Research
Browse By Product
About Us
FAQs
Intern or Volunteer
Staff
Donate
Search WCS.org
Search
search
Popular Search Terms
WCS History
Library and Archives
Library and Archives Menu
Library
Archives
WCS Research
Archives Shop
About Us
Donate
en
fr
Title
Local spatial structure of forest biomass and its consequences for remote sensing of carbon stocks
Author(s)
Réjou-Méchain, M.;Muller-Landau, H. C.;Detto, M.;Thomas, S. C.;Le Toan, T.;Saatchi, S. S.;Barreto-Silva, J. S.;Bourg, N. A.;Bunyavejchewin, S.;Butt, N.;Brockelman, W. Y.;Cao, M.;Cárdenas, D.;Chiang, J. M.;Chuyong, G. B.;Clay, K.;Condit, R.;Dattaraja, H. S.;Davies, S. J.;Duque, A.;Esufali, S.;Ewango, C.;Fernando, R. H. S.;Fletcher, C. D.;Gunatilleke, I. A. U. N.;Hao, Z.;Harms, K. E.;Hart, T. B.;Hérault, B.;Howe, R. W.;Hubbell, S. P.;Johnson, D. J.;Kenfack, D.;Larson, A. J.;Lin, L.;Lin, Y.;Lutz, J. A.;Makana, J. R.;Malhi, Y.;Marthews, T. R.;McEwan, R. W.;McMahon, S. M.;McShea, W. J.;Muscarella, R.;Nathalang, A.;Noor, N. S. M.;Nytch, C. J.;Oliveira, A. A.;Phillips, R. P.;Pongpattananurak, N.;Punchi-Manage, R.;Salim, R.;Schurman, J.;Sukumar, R.;Suresh, H. S.;Suwanvecho, U.;Thomas, D. W.;Thompson, J.;Uríarte, M.;Valencia, R.;Vicentini, A.;Wolf, A. T.;Yap, S.;Yuan, Z.;Zartman, C. E.;Zimmerman, J. K.;Chave, J.
Published
2014
Publisher
Biogeosciences Discussions
Published Version DOI
https://doi.org/10.5194/bgd-11-5711-2014
Abstract
Advances in forest carbon mapping have the potential to greatly reduce uncertainties in the global carbon budget and to facilitate effective emissions mitigation strategies such as REDD+. Though broad scale mapping is based primarily on remote sensing data, the accuracy of resulting forest carbon stock estimates depends critically on the quality of field measurements and calibration procedures. The mismatch in spatial scales between field inventory plots and larger pixels of current and planned remote sensing products for forest biomass mapping is of particular concern, as it has the potential to introduce errors, especially if forest biomass shows strong local spatial variation. Here, we used 30 large (8–50 ha) globally distributed permanent forest plots to quantify the spatial variability in aboveground biomass (AGB) at spatial grains ranging from 5 to 250 m (0.025–6.25 ha), and we evaluate the implications of this variability for calibrating remote sensing products using simulated remote sensing footprints. We found that the spatial sampling error in AGB is large for standard plot sizes, averaging 46.3% for 0.1 ha subplots and 16.6% for 1 ha subplots. Topographically heterogeneous sites showed positive spatial autocorrelation in AGB at scales of 100 m and above; at smaller scales, most study sites showed negative or nonexistent spatial autocorrelation in AGB. We further show that when field calibration plots are smaller than the remote sensing pixels, the high local spatial variability in AGB leads to a substantial "dilution" bias in calibration parameters, a bias that cannot be removed with current statistical methods. Overall, our results suggest that topography should be explicitly accounted for in future sampling strategies and that much care must be taken in designing calibration schemes if remote sensing of forest carbon is to achieve its promise.
Access Full Text
A full-text copy of this article may be available. Please email the
WCS Library
to request.
Back
PUB15316