Title
In defense of fences—Response
Author(s)
Woodroffe, R.;Hedges, S.;Durant, S.
Published
2014
Publisher
Science
Abstract
The conclusion of Pfeifer et al.—that wildlife fencing should be context-dependent—echoes our own call for fencing decisions to be based on realistic assessments of the costs and benefits. We did not, as Pfeifer et al.suggest, state that fencing impacts were invariably negative, nor did we express a view that fence removal was imperative.

Access Full Text

A full-text copy of this article may be available. Please email the WCS Library to request.



Back

PUB15388