Skip to main content
WCS
Menu
Library
Library Catalog
eJournals & eBooks
WCS Research
Archives
Research Use
Finding Aids
Digital Collections
WCS History
WCS Research
Research Publications
Science Data
Services for WCS Researchers
Archives Shop
Bronx Zoo
Department of Tropical Research
Browse By Product
About Us
FAQs
Intern or Volunteer
Staff
Donate
Search WCS.org
Search
search
Popular Search Terms
WCS History
Library and Archives
Library and Archives Menu
Library
Archives
WCS Research
Archives Shop
About Us
Donate
en
fr
Title
Seed dispersal of Vitex glabrata and Prunus ceylanica by Civets (Viverridae) in Pakke Tiger Reserve, north-east India: spatial patterns and post-dispersal seed fates
Author(s)
Chakravarthy, D.;Ratnam, J.
Published
2015
Publisher
Tropical Conservation Science
Abstract
Civets are considered potentially important seed dispersers in tropical forests of Asia, but relatively little is known about spatial patterns of dispersal and post-dispersal fates of civet-dispersed seeds. We explored these aspects of civet seed dispersal for two tree species Vitex glabrata (Lamiaceae), also known as smooth chaste tree and Prunus ceylanica (Rosaceae), in Pakke Tiger Reserve, a tropical forest reserve in north-east India. Pakke has five known species of viverrids: small Indian civet (Viverricula indica), large Indian civet (Viverra zibetha), common palm civet (Paradoxurus hermaphroditus), masked palm civet (Paguma larvata) and the binturong (Arctictis binturong). For both tree species, civets as a group dispersed seeds (100% of scats that we found) within 50 meters from fruiting trees and deposited seeds onto multiple substrates including tree branches, forest floor, and fallen logs. However, the distribution of seeds among substrates differed for the two tree species: while most seeds of V. glabrata (> 90%) were deposited onto canopy branches and fallen logs, the majority of P. ceylanica seeds (> 70%) were deposited on the forest floor. For both tree species, seeds deposited on logs experienced higher seed predation than seeds on the forest floor, especially when local seed densities (number of seeds in 1m2 area around the scat and in the scat) were high. Further, seed viability of P. ceylanica was significantly lower on logs (~35%) than on the forest floor (~65%). For both tree species, civets neither dispersed seeds far from fruiting trees nor to sites where seeds experienced either low predation or high survival, suggesting that while civets were legitimate dispersers, they were not especially effective.
Keywords
Civets;North-east India;Prunus ceylanica;seed dispersal;seed deposition substrates;seed predation;seed viability;Vitex glabrata
Access Full Text
A full-text copy of this article may be available. Please email the
WCS Library
to request.
Back
PUB15443