Title
Megafaunal influences on tree recruitment in African equatorial forests
Author(s)
Terborgh, J.;Davenport, L.C.;Niangadouma, R.;Dimoto, E.;Mouandza, J.C.;Scholtz, O.;Jaen, M. R.
Published
2016
Publisher
Ecography
Published Version DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/ecog.01641
Abstract
The forests of Central Africa are distinct from counterpart forests in Amazonia by having fewer trees ≥10 cm dbh per ha, especially small trees <20 cm dbh, and in having sapling cohorts with less diversity than canopy trees. We tested four hypotheses to investigate whether herbivory, in particular, browsing by forest elephants, could be a factor in these differences. We found that the density of small saplings and diversity of large saplings were inversely associated with local density of elephants. We then tested the hypothesis that steep slopes might serve as refugia from elephant foraging, but found that elephants routinely forage on slopes with an inclination of less than ca 30 deg. Nevertheless, the diversity of small trees (≥10 cm, <20 cm dbh) was higher on slopes than on paired level-ground sites. The incidence of break scars on saplings ≥2 cm dbh and <6 cm dbh was greater (107/100 stems) on level ground than on slopes (77/100 stems), although high variability precluded statistical significance. After correcting for background breakage not caused by elephants, an estimated 71% of breaks on level ground and 43% of breaks on slopes were attributable to elephants. Liana loads borne by trees at different sites were highly variable and unrelated to slope. Apparently, disturbances are more critical to liana development than herbivory. Elephants, along with other large mammals such as gorillas, duikers, red river hogs and rodents, appear to act as powerful filters on the tree recruitment process in African forests that still retain intact megafaunal communities. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
Keywords
Africa;Amazon;elephants;Gabon;herbivores;megafauna;tree diversity;tree recruitment

Access Full Text

A full-text copy of this article may be available. Please email the WCS Library to request.



Back

PUB19299