Skip to main content
WCS
Menu
Library
Library Catalog
eJournals & eBooks
WCS Research
Archives
Research Use
Finding Aids
Digital Collections
WCS History
WCS Research
Research Publications
Science Data
Services for WCS Researchers
Archives Shop
Bronx Zoo
Department of Tropical Research
Browse By Product
About Us
FAQs
Intern or Volunteer
Staff
Donate
Search WCS.org
Search
search
Popular Search Terms
WCS History
Library and Archives
Library and Archives Menu
Library
Archives
WCS Research
Archives Shop
About Us
Donate
en
fr
Title
A novel framework for analyzing conservation impacts: evaluation, theory, and marine protected areas
Author(s)
Mascia, Michael B.;Fox, Helen E.;Glew, Louise;Ahmadia, Gabby N.;Agrawal, Arun;Barnes, Megan;Basurto, Xavier;Craigie, Ian;Darling, Emily;Geldmann, Jonas;Gill, David;Holst Rice, Susie;Jensen, Olaf P.;Lester, Sarah E.;McConney, Patrick;Mumby, Peter J.;Nenadovic, Mateja;Parks, John E.;Pomeroy, Robert S.;White, Alan T.
Published
2017
Publisher
Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences
Published Version DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/nyas.13428
Abstract
Environmental conservation initiatives, including marine protected areas (MPAs), have proliferated in recent decades. Designed to conserve marine biodiversity, many MPAs also seek to foster sustainable development. As is the case for many other environmental policies and programs, the impacts of MPAs are poorly understood. Social–ecological systems, impact evaluation, and common-pool resource governance are three complementary scientific frameworks for documenting and explaining the ecological and social impacts of conservation interventions. We review key components of these three frameworks and their implications for the study of conservation policy, program, and project outcomes. Using MPAs as an illustrative example, we then draw upon these three frameworks to describe an integrated approach for rigorous empirical documentation and causal explanation of conservation impacts. This integrated three-framework approach for impact evaluation of governance in social–ecological systems (3FIGS) accounts for alternative explanations, builds upon and advances social theory, and provides novel policy insights in ways that no single approach affords. Despite the inherent complexity of social–ecological systems and the difficulty of causal inference, the 3FIGS approach can dramatically advance our understanding of, and the evidentiary basis for, effective MPAs and other conservation initiatives.
Keywords
protected areas;impact evaluation;social–ecological systems;common-pool resources;governance;biodiversity conservation;ecological integrity;human well-being
Access Full Text
A full-text copy of this article may be available. Please email the
WCS Library
to request.
Back
PUB22423