Skip to main content
WCS
Menu
Library
Library Catalog
eJournals & eBooks
WCS Research
Archives
Research Use
Finding Aids
Digital Collections
WCS History
WCS Research
Research Publications
Science Data
Services for WCS Researchers
Archives Shop
Bronx Zoo
Department of Tropical Research
Browse By Product
About Us
FAQs
Intern or Volunteer
Staff
Donate
Search WCS.org
Search
search
Popular Search Terms
WCS History
Library and Archives
Library and Archives Menu
Library
Archives
WCS Research
Archives Shop
About Us
Donate
en
fr
Title
Reach and messages of the world's largest ivory burn
Author(s)
Braczkowski, Alexander;Holden, Matthew H.;O'Bryan, Christopher;Choi, Chi-Yeung;Gan, Xiaojing;Beesley, Nicholas;Gao, Yufang;Allan, James;Tyrrell, Peter;Stiles, Daniel;Brehony, Peadar;Meney, Revocatus;Brink, Henry;Takashina, Nao;Lin, Ming-Ching;Lin, Hsien-Yung;Rust, Niki;Salmo, Severino G.;Watson, James E. M.;Kahumbu, Paula;Maron, Martine;Possingham, Hugh P.;Biggs, Duan
Published
2018
Publisher
Conservation Biology
Published Version DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.13097
Abstract
Recent increases in ivory poaching have depressed African elephant populations. Successful enforcement has led to ivory being stockpiled. Stockpile destruction is becoming increasingly popular, and most destruction has occurred in the last five years. Ivory destruction is intended to send a strong message against ivory consumption, both in promoting a taboo on ivory use and catalyzing policy change. However, there has been no effort to establish the distribution and extent of media reporting on ivory destruction events globally. We analyze media coverage across eleven important nation states of the largest ivory destruction event in history (Kenya, 30 April 2016). We used a well-accepted online media crawling tool and key language translations to search online and print newspapers. We found most online news on the ivory burn came from the US (81% of articles), while print news was dominated by Kenya (61% of articles). We subjected online articles from five key countries and territories to content analysis and found 86–97% of all online articles reported the burn as a positive conservation action, while between 4–50% discussed ivory burning as having a negative impact on elephant conservation. Most articles discussed law enforcement and trade bans as effective for elephant conservation. There was more relative search interest globally on the 2016 Kenyan ivory burn than any other in five years. Our study is the first attempt to track the spread of media around an ivory burn and is a case study in tracking the effects of a conservation-marketing event. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved
Keywords
Africa;Elephant;Conservation marketing;Ivory burn;Media reach;Alcance de los medios;Elefante;Mercadotecnia de la conservación;Quema de marfil
Access Full Text
A full-text copy of this article may be available. Please email the
WCS Library
to request.
Back
PUB23915