Skip to main content
WCS
Menu
Library
Library Catalog
eJournals & eBooks
WCS Research
Archives
Research Use
Finding Aids
Digital Collections
WCS History
WCS Research
Research Publications
Science Data
Services for WCS Researchers
Archives Shop
Bronx Zoo
Department of Tropical Research
Browse By Product
About Us
FAQs
Intern or Volunteer
Staff
Donate
Search WCS.org
Search
search
Popular Search Terms
WCS History
Library and Archives
Library and Archives Menu
Library
Archives
WCS Research
Archives Shop
About Us
Donate
en
fr
Title
Effective biodiversity conservation requires dynamic, pluralistic, partnership-based approaches
Author(s)
Gavin, Michael;McCarter, Joe;Berkes, Fikret;Mead, Aroha;Sterling, Eleanor;Tang, Ruifei;Turner, Nancy
Published
2018
Publisher
Sustainability
Published Version DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/su10061846
Abstract
Biodiversity loss undermines the long-term maintenance of ecosystem functions and the well-being of human populations. Global-scale policy initiatives, including the Convention on Biological Diversity, have failed to curb the loss of biodiversity. This failure has led to contentious debates over alternative solutions that represent opposing visions of value-orientations and policy tools at the heart of conservation action. We review these debates and argue that they impede conservation progress by wasting time and resources, overlooking common goals, failing to recognize the need for diverse solutions, and ignoring the central question of who should be involved in the conservation process. Breaking with the polarizing debates, we argue that biocultural approaches to conservation can guide progress toward just and sustainable conservation solutions. We provide examples of the central principles of biocultural conservation, which emphasize the need for pluralistic, partnership-based, and dynamic approaches to conservation.
Keywords
adaptive management and governance;biocultural approaches to conservation;different worldviews and knowledge systems;Gwaii Haanas;nested institutional frameworks;multiple stakeholders and objectives;New Conservation Science;partnerships and relationship building;rights and responsibilities;social-ecological context
Access Full Text
A full-text copy of this article may be available. Please email the
WCS Library
to request.
Back
PUB23996