Skip to main content
WCS
Menu
Library
Library Catalog
eJournals & eBooks
WCS Research
Archives
Research Use
Finding Aids
Digital Collections
WCS History
WCS Research
Research Publications
Science Data
Services for WCS Researchers
Archives Shop
Bronx Zoo
Department of Tropical Research
Browse By Product
About Us
FAQs
Intern or Volunteer
Staff
Donate
Search WCS.org
Search
search
Popular Search Terms
WCS History
Library and Archives
Library and Archives Menu
Library
Archives
WCS Research
Archives Shop
About Us
Donate
en
fr
Title
Local conditions and policy design determine whether ecological compensation can achieve No Net Loss goals
Author(s)
Sonter, Laura J.;Simmonds, Jeremy S.;Watson, James E. M.;...;Costa, Hugo M.;...;Grantham, Hedley S.;Griffiths, Victoria F.;Jones, Kendall;...;Rainey, Hugo;...;Victurine, Ray;et al.
Published
2020
Publisher
Nature Communications
Published Version DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-15861-1
Abstract
Many nations use ecological compensation policies to address negative impacts of development projects and achieve No Net Loss (NNL) of biodiversity and ecosystem services. Yet, failures are widely reported. We use spatial simulation models to quantify potential net impacts of alternative compensation policies on biodiversity (indicated by native vegetation) and two ecosystem services (carbon storage, sediment retention) across four case studies (in Australia, Brazil, Indonesia, Mozambique). No policy achieves NNL of biodiversity in any case study. Two factors limit their potential success: the land available for compensation (existing vegetation to protect or cleared land to restore), and expected counterfactual biodiversity losses (unregulated vegetation clearing). Compensation also fails to slow regional biodiversity declines because policies regulate only a subset of sectors, and expanding policy scope requires more land than is available for compensation activities. Avoidance of impacts remains essential in achieving NNL goals, particularly once opportunities for compensation are exhausted.
Keywords
conservation biology;ecosystem services;environmental impact
Access Full Text
A full-text copy of this article may be available. Please email the
WCS Library
to request.
Back
PUB25146