Skip to main content
WCS
Menu
Library
Library Catalog
eJournals & eBooks
WCS Research
Archives
Research Use
Finding Aids
Digital Collections
WCS History
WCS Research
Research Publications
Science Data
Services for WCS Researchers
Archives Shop
Bronx Zoo
Department of Tropical Research
Browse By Product
About Us
FAQs
Intern or Volunteer
Staff
Donate
Search WCS.org
Search
search
Popular Search Terms
WCS History
Library and Archives
Library and Archives Menu
Library
Archives
WCS Research
Archives Shop
About Us
Donate
en
fr
Title
Conservation birding: A quantitative conceptual framework for prioritizing citizen science observations
Author(s)
Callaghan, Corey T.;Watson, James E.M.;Lyons, Mitchell B.;Cornwell, William K.;Fuller, Richard A.
Published
2021
Publisher
Biological Conservation
Published Version DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2020.108912
Abstract
Despite impressive growth in global biodiversity data, knowledge about the occurrence of species in many parts of the world remains incomplete because of major gaps in the underlying data. This can lead to ill-informed conservation decisions. The collective effort of citizen scientists can generate a great deal of data quickly, but how might we prioritize the powerful - but finite - effort? We argue that instead of simply filling empty spots on the map based solely on where biodiversity information is incomplete, near-term threats to the integrity or persistence of biodiversity assemblages could also be incorporated to prioritize citizen science sampling. Here we develop a quantitative framework illustrating how citizen science sampling and initiatives can be prioritized when simultaneously considering both the completeness of biodiversity sampling and the risk of habitat conversion. We illustrate this framework for birds using global citizen science data from the eBird platform and a global model of the risk of habitat conversion. We find that regions in Africa and southeast Asia would rank as the highest priorities for new and expanded citizen science initiatives. Our framework provides a mechanism to quantify where new biodiversity data are most urgently needed, ultimately helping to improve environmental decision-making. We anticipate this framework can be used in the future at a suite of relevant planning scales, ranging from local to regional to global.
Keywords
Biodiversity data;Big data;Citizen science;Community science;Spatial and temporal gaps;Biodiversity sampling;Species richness
Access Full Text
A full-text copy of this article may be available. Please email the
WCS Library
to request.
Back
PUB25625