Skip to main content
WCS
Menu
Library
Library Catalog
eJournals & eBooks
WCS Research
Archives
Research Use
Finding Aids
Digital Collections
WCS History
WCS Research
Research Publications
Science Data
Services for WCS Researchers
Archives Shop
Bronx Zoo
Department of Tropical Research
Browse By Product
About Us
FAQs
Intern or Volunteer
Staff
Donate
Search WCS.org
Search
search
Popular Search Terms
WCS History
Library and Archives
Library and Archives Menu
Library
Archives
WCS Research
Archives Shop
About Us
Donate
en
fr
Title
Comparison of point transect distance and traditional acoustic point‐count sampling of hoolock gibbons in Htamanthi Wildlife Sanctuary, Myanmar
Author(s)
Brockelman, Warren Y.;Tun, Aung Ye;Pan, Su;Naing, Hla;Htun, Saw
Published
2020
Publisher
American Journal of Primatology
Published Version DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/ajp.23198
Abstract
Effective conservation demands more accurate and reliable methods of survey and monitoring of populations. Surveys of gibbon populations have relied mostly on mapping of groups in “listening areas” using acoustical point‐count data. Traditional methods of estimating density in have usually used counts of gibbon groups within fixed‐radius areas or areas bounded by terrain barriers to sound transmission, and have not accounted for possible decline in detectability with distance. In this study we sampled the eastern hoolock gibbon (Hoolock leucogenys) population in Htamanthi Wildlife Sanctuary (WS), Myanmar, using two methods: the traditional point‐count method with fixed‐radius listening areas, and a newer method using point‐transect Distance analysis from a sample point established in the center of each listening point array. The basic data were obtained by triangulating on singing groups from four LPs for 4 days, in 10 randomly selected sample areas within the sanctuary. The point transect method gave an average density of 3.13 groups km−2, higher than the estimates of group density within fixed‐radius areas without correction for detectability. A new method of analysis of singing probability per day (p[1]) gave an estimate of 0.547. Htamanthi WS is an important conservation area containing an estimated 7000 (95% confidence interval: 5000–10,000) hoolock groups. Surveys at Htamanthi WS and locations in the Hukaung Valley suggest that the extensive evergreen forests in northern Myanmar have the capacity to support 2–4 (average about 3) groups of hoolock gibbons per km2, but most forests in its range have yet to be surveyed.
Keywords
acoustic sampling;hoolock leucogenys;Htamanthi Wildlife Sanctuary;Myanmar;point transect method
Access Full Text
A full-text copy of this article may be available. Please email the
WCS Library
to request.
Back
PUB25853