Skip to main content
WCS
Menu
Library
Library Catalog
eJournals & eBooks
WCS Research
Archives
Research Use
Finding Aids
Digital Collections
WCS History
WCS Research
Research Publications
Science Data
Services for WCS Researchers
Archives Shop
Bronx Zoo
Department of Tropical Research
Browse By Product
About Us
FAQs
Intern or Volunteer
Staff
Donate
Search WCS.org
Search
search
Popular Search Terms
WCS History
Library and Archives
Library and Archives Menu
Library
Archives
WCS Research
Archives Shop
About Us
Donate
en
fr
Title
Setting robust biodiversity goals
Author(s)
Maron, Martine; Juffe-Bignoli, Diego; Krueger, Linda; Kiesecker, Joseph; Kümpel, Noëlle F.; ten Kate, Kerry; Milner-Gulland, E.J.; Arlidge, William N. S.; Booth, Hollie; Bull, Joseph W.; Starkey, Malcolm; Ekstrom, Jonathan M.; Strassburg, Bernardo; Verburg, Peter H.; Watson, James E. M.
Published
2021
Publisher
Conservation Letters
Published Version DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/conl.12816
Abstract
The new global biodiversity framework (GBF) being developed under the Convention on Biological Diversity must drive action to reverse the ongoing decline of the Earth's biodiversity. Explicit, measurable goals that specify the outcomes we want to achieve are needed to set the course for this action. However, the current draft goals and targets fail to set out these clear outcomes. We argue that distinct outcome goals for species, ecosystems, and genetic diversity are essential and should specify net outcomes required for each. Net outcome goals such as “no net loss” do, however, have a controversial history, and loose specification can lead to perverse outcomes. We outline seven general principles to underpin net outcome goal setting that minimize risk of such perverse outcomes. Finally, we recommend inclusion of statements of impact in action targets that support biodiversity goals, and we illustrate the importance of this with an example from the draft GBF action targets. These modifications would help reveal the specific contribution each action would make to achieving the outcome goals and provide clarity on whether the successful achievement of action targets would be adequate to achieve the outcome goals and, in turn, the 2050 vision: living in harmony with nature.
Keywords
conservation policy; conservation targets; Convention on Biological Diversity; ecosystem collapse; global biodiversity framework; national commitments; net gain; no net loss; perverse outcomes; species extinction
Access Full Text
A full-text copy of this article may be available. Please email the
WCS Library
to request.
Back
PUB26449