Skip to main content
WCS
Menu
Library
Library Catalog
eJournals & eBooks
WCS Research
Archives
Research Use
Finding Aids
Digital Collections
WCS History
WCS Research
Research Publications
Science Data
Services for WCS Researchers
Archives Shop
Bronx Zoo
Department of Tropical Research
Browse By Product
About Us
FAQs
Intern or Volunteer
Staff
Donate
Search WCS.org
Search
search
Popular Search Terms
WCS History
Library and Archives
Library and Archives Menu
Library
Archives
WCS Research
Archives Shop
About Us
Donate
en
fr
Title
Assessing the Role of PAs in the Conservation of Vertebrates in latin America: On the Ground Data.
Author(s)
Forero-Medina, German; Marquez, Robert; Valenzuela, Leonor
Published
2017
Abstract
Protected Areas (PAs) are one of the main strategies for conservation of biodiversity worldwide. In Latin America, where rapid deforestation and ecosystem degradation continue to occur, PAs are established with the purpose of counteracting these threats and avoid species loss. However, most areas lack rigorous monitoring programs to assess the effectiveness for conservation. Recent studies have focused on remote sensing data and matching techniques to evaluate effectiveness of PAs in a quasi-experimental way. Fewer studies rely on the ground data to assess such impact for variables different than land cover. For example, many PAs are established with the purpose of ensuring persistence of populations of vertebrates. However, few studies are designed to evaluate the effect of PAs for the conservation of these species, using quantitative, quasi-experimental designs, like the ones implemented using remote sensors. Such experimental designs may allow for regional assessments of PAs effectiveness and an understanding of the factors that contribute to success. We present a set of examples with quantitative assessments of species populations, using occupancy estimation or distance sampling, conducted inside and outside of a particular PA. In some cases, PAs maintain the last remaining habitat of a species, in other cases there is habitat left outside the PA, but not of enough quality, like Selva de Florencia National Park and the Brown-Spider Monkey (Density in PA= 4,3 ind./ km2; outside=0). Other examples show the PA per se is not responsible for a higher occupancy, as for the Andean Bear in Tatamá National Park (Occupancy inside=0,64; outside=0,58, no effect). In other cases, a PA may show effect for some species but not for others. If conducted systematically, this approach would allow evaluation of effectiveness at large scales, in a similar fashion and additionally to the remote sensing analyses
Access Full Text
A full-text copy of this article may be available. Please email the
WCS Library
to request.
Back
PUB26783