Skip to main content
WCS
Menu
Library
Library Catalog
eJournals & eBooks
WCS Research
Archives
Research Use
Finding Aids
Digital Collections
WCS History
WCS Research
Research Publications
Science Data
Services for WCS Researchers
Archives Shop
Bronx Zoo
Department of Tropical Research
Browse By Product
About Us
FAQs
Intern or Volunteer
Staff
Donate
Search WCS.org
Search
search
Popular Search Terms
WCS History
Library and Archives
Library and Archives Menu
Library
Archives
WCS Research
Archives Shop
About Us
Donate
en
fr
Title
Comparison of two individual identification algorithms for snow leopards after automated detection
Author(s)
Blount, Drew; Bohnett, Eve; Holmberg, Jason; Parham, Jason; Faryabi, Sorosh Poya; Johansson, Örjan; An, Li; Ahmad, Bilal; Khan, Wajid; Ostrowski, Stephane
Published
Preprint
Publisher
bioRxiv
Published Version DOI
https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.01.20.477059
Abstract
1. Photo-identification of individual snow leopards (Panthera uncia) is the primary technique for density estimation for the species. A high volume of images from multiple projects, combined with pre-existing historical catalogs, has made identifying snow leopard individuals within the images cost- and time-intensive. 2. To speed the classification among a high volume of photographs, we trained and evaluated image classification methods for PIE v2 (a triplet loss network), and we compared PIE’s accuracy to the HotSpotter algorithm (a SIFT based algorithm). Analyzed data were collected from a curated catalog of free-ranging snow leopards photographed across years (2012-2019) in Afghanistan and from samples in captivity provided by zoos from Finland, Sweden, Germany, and the United States. 3. Results show that PIE outperforms HotSpotter. We also found weaknesses in the initial PIE model, like a minor amount of background matching, which was addressed, although likely not fully resolved, by applying background subtraction (BGS) and left-right mirroring (LR) methods. The PIE BGS LR model combined with Hotspotter showed a Rank-1: 85%, Rank-5: 95%, Rank-20: 99%. 4. Overall, our results recommend implementing PIE v2 simultaneously with HotSpotter on Whiskerbook.org.
Keywords
bioinformatics
Access Full Text
A full-text copy of this article may be available. Please email the
WCS Library
to request.
Back
PUB27298