Title
Collaborative wildlife–snow science: Integrating wildlife and snow expertise to improve research and management
Author(s)
Reinking, Adele K.; Højlund Pedersen, Stine; Elder, Kelly; Boelman, Natalie T.; Glass, Thomas W.; Oates, Brendan A.; Bergen, Scott; Roberts, Shane; Prugh, Laura R.; Brinkman, Todd J.; Coughenour, Michael B.; Feltner, Jennifer A.; Barker, Kristin J.; Bentzen, Torsten W.; Pedersen, Åshild Ø.; Schmidt, Niels M.; Liston, Glen E.
Published
2022
Publisher
Ecosphere
Published Version DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.4094
Abstract
For wildlife inhabiting snowy environments, snow properties such as onset date, depth, strength, and distribution can influence many aspects of ecology, including movement, community dynamics, energy expenditure, and forage accessibility. As a result, snow plays a considerable role in individual fitness and ultimately population dynamics, and its evaluation is, therefore, important for comprehensive understanding of ecosystem processes in regions experiencing snow. Such understanding, and particularly study of how wildlife–snow relationships may be changing, grows more urgent as winter processes become less predictable and often more extreme under global climate change. However, studying and monitoring wildlife–snow relationships continue to be challenging because characterizing snow, an inherently complex and constantly changing environmental feature, and identifying, accessing, and applying relevant snow information at appropriate spatial and temporal scales, often require a detailed understanding of physical snow science and technologies that typically lie outside the expertise of wildlife researchers and managers. We argue that thoroughly assessing the role of snow in wildlife ecology requires substantive collaboration between researchers with expertise in each of these two fields, leveraging the discipline-specific knowledge brought by both wildlife and snow professionals. To facilitate this collaboration and encourage more effective exploration of wildlife–snow questions, we provide a five-step protocol: (1) identify relevant snow property information; (2) specify spatial, temporal, and informational requirements; (3) build the necessary datasets; (4) implement quality control procedures; and (5) incorporate snow information into wildlife analyses. Additionally, we explore the types of snow information that can be used within this collaborative framework. We illustrate, in the context of two examples, field observations, remote-sensing datasets, and four example modeling tools that simulate spatiotemporal snow property distributions and, in some cases, evolutions. For each type of snow data, we highlight the collaborative opportunities for wildlife and snow professionals when designing snow data collection efforts, processing snow remote sensing products, producing tailored snow datasets, and applying the resulting snow information in wildlife analyses. We seek to provide a clear path for wildlife professionals to address wildlife–snow questions and improve ecological inference by integrating the best available snow science through collaboration with snow professionals.
Keywords
collaboration; data–model fusion; interdisciplinary; snow data; snow modeling; SnowModel; wildlife ecology; wildlife management; wildlife research; wildlife–snow;winter

Access Full Text

A full-text copy of this article may be available. Please email the WCS Library to request.



Back

PUB35644