Skip to main content
WCS
Menu
Library
Library Catalog
eJournals & eBooks
WCS Research
Archives
Research Use
Finding Aids
Digital Collections
WCS History
WCS Research
Research Publications
Science Data
Services for WCS Researchers
Archives Shop
Bronx Zoo
Department of Tropical Research
Browse By Product
About Us
FAQs
Intern or Volunteer
Staff
Donate
Search WCS.org
Search
search
Popular Search Terms
WCS History
Library and Archives
Library and Archives Menu
Library
Archives
WCS Research
Archives Shop
About Us
Donate
en
fr
Title
A collaboratively-derived science-policy research agenda
Author(s)
Sutherland, W. J.;Bellingan, L.;Bellingham, J. R.;Blackstock, J. J.;Bloomfield, R. M.;Bravo, M.;Cadman, V. M.;Cleevely, D. D.;Clements, A.;Cohen, A. S.;Cope, D. R.;Daemmrich, A. A.;Devecchi, C.;Anadon, L. D.;Denegri, S.;Doubleday, R.;Dusic, N. R.;Evans, R. J.;Feng, W. Y.;Godfray, H. C. J.;Harris, P.;Hartley, S. E.;Hester, A. J.;Holmes, J.;Hughes, A.;Hulme, M.;Irwin, C.;Jennings, R. C.;Kass, G. S.;Littlejohns, P.;Marteau, T. M.;McKee, G.;Millstone, E. P.;Nuttall, W. J.;Owens, S.;Parker, M. M.;Pearson, S.;Petts, J.;Ploszek, R.;Pullin, A. S.;Reid, G.;Richards, K. S.;Robinson, J. G.;Shaxson, L.;Sierra, L.;Smith, B. G.;Spiegelhalter, D. J.;Stilgoe, J.;Stirling, A.;Tyler, C. P.;Winickoff, D. E.;Zimmern, R. L.
Published
2012
Publisher
PLoS ONE
Published Version DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0031824
Abstract
The need for policy makers to understand science and for scientists to understand policy processes is widely recognised. However, the science-policy relationship is sometimes difficult and occasionally dysfunctional; it is also increasingly visible, because it must deal with contentious issues, or itself becomes a matter of public controversy, or both. We suggest that identifying key unanswered questions on the relationship between science and policy will catalyse and focus research in this field. To identify these questions, a collaborative procedure was employed with 52 participants selected to cover a wide range of experience in both science and policy, including people from government, non-governmental organisations, academia and industry. These participants consulted with colleagues and submitted 239 questions. An initial round of voting was followed by a workshop in which 40 of the most important questions were identified by further discussion and voting. The resulting list includes questions about the effectiveness of science-based decision-making structures; the nature and legitimacy of expertise; the consequences of changes such as increasing transparency; choices among different sources of evidence; the implications of new means of characterising and representing uncertainties; and ways in which policy and political processes affect what counts as authoritative evidence. We expect this exercise to identify important theoretical questions and to help improve the mutual understanding and effectiveness of those working at the interface of science and policy. © 2012 Sutherland et al.
Access Full Text
A full-text copy of this article may be available. Please email the
WCS Library
to request.
Back
PUB14825