Skip to main content
WCS
Menu
Library
Library Catalog
eJournals & eBooks
WCS Research
Archives
Research Use
Finding Aids
Digital Collections
WCS History
WCS Research
Research Publications
Science Data
Services for WCS Researchers
Archives Shop
Bronx Zoo
Department of Tropical Research
Browse By Product
About Us
FAQs
Intern or Volunteer
Staff
Donate
Search WCS.org
Search
search
Popular Search Terms
WCS History
Library and Archives
Library and Archives Menu
Library
Archives
WCS Research
Archives Shop
About Us
Donate
en
fr
Title
In defense of fences—Response
Author(s)
Woodroffe, R.;Hedges, S.;Durant, S.
Published
2014
Publisher
Science
Published Version DOI
https://doi.org/10.1126/science.345.6195.389-b
Abstract
The conclusion of Pfeifer et al.—that wildlife fencing should be context-dependent—echoes our own call for fencing decisions to be based on realistic assessments of the costs and benefits. We did not, as Pfeifer et al.suggest, state that fencing impacts were invariably negative, nor did we express a view that fence removal was imperative.
Access Full Text
A full-text copy of this article may be available. Please email the
WCS Library
to request.
Back
PUB15388