Skip to main content
WCS
Menu
Library
Library Catalog
eJournals & eBooks
WCS Research
Archives
Research Use
Finding Aids
Digital Collections
WCS History
WCS Research
Research Publications
Science Data
Services for WCS Researchers
Archives Shop
Bronx Zoo
Department of Tropical Research
Browse By Product
About Us
FAQs
Intern or Volunteer
Staff
Donate
Search WCS.org
Search
search
Popular Search Terms
WCS History
Library and Archives
Library and Archives Menu
Library
Archives
WCS Research
Archives Shop
About Us
Donate
en
fr
Title
Scientific evidence does not support the translocation of guanacos in Argentina
Author(s)
Balza, Ulises;Baldi, Ricardo;Rodríguez-Planes, Lucía;Ojeda, Ricardo;Schiavini, Adrián
Published
2023
Publisher
Conservation Science and Practice
Published Version DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/csp2.13031
Abstract
The Argentinian Ministry of Environment has approved the translocation of 45 guanacos from Southern Patagonia to the Pampas region, a distance of 1500 km, as the initial phase toward future translocations into a National Park located in the Chaco region, another 1600 km further North. This decision raises concerns about the technical and ethical aspects of the translocation. Firstly, there is a lack of proper evaluation and scientific evidence to support the need, opportunity, and feasibility of this translocation. The guanaco population is currently over one million and is increasing, and genetic differences exist among local populations. The translocation could produce anthropogenic-driven admixed populations, leading to genetic swamping and disrupting evolutionary processes. Second, there are ethical conflicts around managing wild species populations that prioritize private objectives and disregard local, publicly funded science. Rewilding projects require a deep understanding of interacting ecosystem processes, and of the socio-economic context. This management decision violates guiding principles for rewilding and should have followed proper scientific evaluation and transparent local consultation.
Keywords
camelids; ethical concerns; genetic structure; public funding; reintroduction
Access Full Text
A full-text copy of this article may be available. Please email the
WCS Library
to request.
Back
PUB36175